rani77
08-30 10:53 AM
Isnt recording conversations without the consent illegal? :confused:
This may be correct but , if you sent the tape of employer abusing /cursing its own employees to DOL along with other allegations , they might well pay special attention and scrutinize him or his company thoroghly.
This may be correct but , if you sent the tape of employer abusing /cursing its own employees to DOL along with other allegations , they might well pay special attention and scrutinize him or his company thoroghly.
wallpaper Hayden Panettiere
diptam
07-17 12:09 AM
I mean i filed without both of those. Theyare required in the 140 phase , not in 485.
But keep them handy - in case they wants mail by next day air
Hi,
My attorney is requesting that I need to submit Tax return for filing AOS.
I had sent W2 forms
Is tax return separate from W2 , I am confused..:confused:
Pls help
But keep them handy - in case they wants mail by next day air
Hi,
My attorney is requesting that I need to submit Tax return for filing AOS.
I had sent W2 forms
Is tax return separate from W2 , I am confused..:confused:
Pls help
ivar
02-07 09:51 AM
Dear "ivar" congratulations on getting greened! I humbly request you to be with us till you can :D
gc_peshwa, SGP
I am used to visiting IV everyday so i don't think i will stop that and i will also be donating for few months from now.
gc_peshwa, SGP
I am used to visiting IV everyday so i don't think i will stop that and i will also be donating for few months from now.
2011 Hang with Hayden Panettiere at
JunRN
09-17 10:10 AM
Once this bill passed the Committee, there are more work to do. We need to call again so that it will be put to vote at the Full House level and then, at the Senate.
I sent "Thank you!!!" flowers to Sen. Menendez for sponsoring the same bill in the Senate.
Let's call again today. Time is precious.
I sent "Thank you!!!" flowers to Sen. Menendez for sponsoring the same bill in the Senate.
Let's call again today. Time is precious.
more...
needhelp!
04-15 05:35 PM
I'm happy it finally worked out for you! Will you be changing your handle now ? :)
hope2007
04-15 11:46 AM
changing job location...
more...
sweet_jungle
09-24 03:12 PM
Applying to a top MBA program is quite intense, especially if you come from a competitive applicant pool. eg: laid off investment banker (plenty of those headed to B-school), Indian-engineer, Chinese-anything, etc. Are you sure you want to go through the effort and expense of the application process if you cannot attend? It takes about 3-4 weeks to put a serious application package together - maybe you can put this time to better use by applying to a program that you can actually attend. That can also be a plan-B in case something goes wrong with the GC application.
Think it through and good luck with your decision. Wish you the Best.
thanks for your advice. It is still OK if due to GC screwup, I cannot attend rather than my GC comes through next year, and I fret over why I did not apply. of couse, this is a personal choice. But, this is how I have decided to face the situation. I know of people who have applied 3 times and gone through. Also, deferrals for genuine reasons are allowed by schools, though not all.
Also, MBA process is less stressful than say, applying to MS from India. Being in USA for last few years, we now know better about what is what.
Think it through and good luck with your decision. Wish you the Best.
thanks for your advice. It is still OK if due to GC screwup, I cannot attend rather than my GC comes through next year, and I fret over why I did not apply. of couse, this is a personal choice. But, this is how I have decided to face the situation. I know of people who have applied 3 times and gone through. Also, deferrals for genuine reasons are allowed by schools, though not all.
Also, MBA process is less stressful than say, applying to MS from India. Being in USA for last few years, we now know better about what is what.
2010 hayden panettiere pictures 9#
BMS1
08-21 02:16 PM
So, once you have finished the security check, your I485 is approved, unless CIS wants to interview you. You said only a small percentage, wow, I hope I don't get called for interview.
How long did you wait after your biometrics to get your 485 got approved?
There were twobiometrics. One was with initial application (probably Nov/Dec 2005) and another was in May 2007 when the first one expired (FP is valid for 15 months).
How long did you wait after your biometrics to get your 485 got approved?
There were twobiometrics. One was with initial application (probably Nov/Dec 2005) and another was in May 2007 when the first one expired (FP is valid for 15 months).
more...
javanmard
03-22 02:51 AM
Hi bfadlia,
Did u receive ur extension? My case is pretty same, my receipt notice date has passed but no change in LUD. My case is in CSC. Have u received any RFE? Some ppl were saying that it takes around 3 months for getting approval from CSC.
Thanks
Did u receive ur extension? My case is pretty same, my receipt notice date has passed but no change in LUD. My case is in CSC. Have u received any RFE? Some ppl were saying that it takes around 3 months for getting approval from CSC.
Thanks
hair Miss Hayden Panettiere.
yabadaba
07-13 11:15 AM
it will look like the WaMu ad. buncha ppl in suits behind a baricade.
http://www.randomculture.com/random_culture/images/trappedbanker.jpg
wear white shits and jeans..standard protest outfit
dont get carried away...follow the organizers...admin delete this thread.
http://www.randomculture.com/random_culture/images/trappedbanker.jpg
wear white shits and jeans..standard protest outfit
dont get carried away...follow the organizers...admin delete this thread.
more...
scorpion00
10-06 02:43 PM
Hi Manish,
I hope everything goes well with you.
Did the officials call you or come to see you in person?
I hope everything goes well with you.
Did the officials call you or come to see you in person?
hot Hayden Panettiere Premieres
Madhuri
07-11 11:02 PM
If this is true it's really horrible and scary that this gov. agency is handling our applications.
This is beginning to look more and more like a organized and deliberate attempt to block people from filing for AOS.If the mysterious "knowledgeable official" quoted on the website can be summoned in court- that would be game over for the USCIS right there......
http://www.usimmlaw.com/current_information.htm
Copying the contents of the website below :
Visa numbers WERE available July 2nd!!
We have confirmed with a knowledgeable official in the Department of State Visa Office that USCIS was requesting visa numbers on Sunday July 1st, and Monday morning July 2nd - and that visa numbers were still being issued as late as the morning of July 2nd!
In fact, close to 30,000 visa numbers were requested and issued in July - through the morning of July 2nd. And we believe that many - if not most - of the requests made in the first two days of July were for applicants whose priority dates were not current in June!
So how can USCIS refuse to accept I-485 filings received BEFORE the State Department issued its notice that all visa numbers had been used???? We have not yet confirmed the return of any I-485s filed in July. But we do know that applications were reaching the USCIS before the State Department announcement - and while the USCIS was frantically working to use up the entire year's allocation.
USCIS did not use all visa numbers before July 2nd.
Did USCIS actually use the visa numbers it requested????
Historically, the USCIS doesn't request a visa number from the Department of State until it is ready to grant the adjustment of status application. US Consuls overseas request visa numbers the month before they intend to issue the immigrant visa. This is the reason why consuls return about ten percent of the visa numbers requested - and why USCIS does not generally return any numbers.
In fact, in making allocations of visa numbers, the Department of State factors in an expected return rate for consuls - but not for the USCIS. And the USCIS - before this June - used about 85% of the total immigrant visa numbers available.
However, already this month, the USCIS has been returning visa numbers. This confirms our earlier suspicion that the only way the USCIS could request 68,000 visa numbers in a matter of weeks was to request them in advance of adjudicating cases.
We believe USCIS exhausted the visa numbers by simply requesting them - not by using them. If so, and for reasons we will post shortly, we believe that over 30,000 visa numbers requested by USCIS will go unused - and will be wasted this year!
This is beginning to look more and more like a organized and deliberate attempt to block people from filing for AOS.If the mysterious "knowledgeable official" quoted on the website can be summoned in court- that would be game over for the USCIS right there......
http://www.usimmlaw.com/current_information.htm
Copying the contents of the website below :
Visa numbers WERE available July 2nd!!
We have confirmed with a knowledgeable official in the Department of State Visa Office that USCIS was requesting visa numbers on Sunday July 1st, and Monday morning July 2nd - and that visa numbers were still being issued as late as the morning of July 2nd!
In fact, close to 30,000 visa numbers were requested and issued in July - through the morning of July 2nd. And we believe that many - if not most - of the requests made in the first two days of July were for applicants whose priority dates were not current in June!
So how can USCIS refuse to accept I-485 filings received BEFORE the State Department issued its notice that all visa numbers had been used???? We have not yet confirmed the return of any I-485s filed in July. But we do know that applications were reaching the USCIS before the State Department announcement - and while the USCIS was frantically working to use up the entire year's allocation.
USCIS did not use all visa numbers before July 2nd.
Did USCIS actually use the visa numbers it requested????
Historically, the USCIS doesn't request a visa number from the Department of State until it is ready to grant the adjustment of status application. US Consuls overseas request visa numbers the month before they intend to issue the immigrant visa. This is the reason why consuls return about ten percent of the visa numbers requested - and why USCIS does not generally return any numbers.
In fact, in making allocations of visa numbers, the Department of State factors in an expected return rate for consuls - but not for the USCIS. And the USCIS - before this June - used about 85% of the total immigrant visa numbers available.
However, already this month, the USCIS has been returning visa numbers. This confirms our earlier suspicion that the only way the USCIS could request 68,000 visa numbers in a matter of weeks was to request them in advance of adjudicating cases.
We believe USCIS exhausted the visa numbers by simply requesting them - not by using them. If so, and for reasons we will post shortly, we believe that over 30,000 visa numbers requested by USCIS will go unused - and will be wasted this year!
more...
house Hayden Panettiere Hairstyles
pkv
01-07 06:13 PM
Thanks Sanjay02.
Another follow-up question.. I'm planning to file for EAD, which passport number should I use in this form ?
If I use new one(which is valid), isn't it in contra with AOS application?
Has anyone faced this situation ?
Another follow-up question.. I'm planning to file for EAD, which passport number should I use in this form ?
If I use new one(which is valid), isn't it in contra with AOS application?
Has anyone faced this situation ?
tattoo Hayden Panettiere and Kristen
sayantan76
12-07 06:21 PM
Maybe the definition of project managers varies by company. Most PMs I know have maybe around 6-7 years of work experience and I definitely wouldn't classify them as executives or even say that their employment is in the National Interest.
However I do know of some cases where doctors have got NIW based on practicing in an under-served (rural?) area.
Is there a way to prove that one who created a suite of applications without which a business unit will stop functioning comes under National Interest?
Just a thought.
I think - the spirit of EB-1 (manager) has to do with having full managerial control over people (performance management, hiring/ firing/ compensation rather than just supervisory control) and/or a business portfolio (say - head of a business division)
but as someone pointed out - let lawyers figure out the best strategy for each case.......
However I do know of some cases where doctors have got NIW based on practicing in an under-served (rural?) area.
Is there a way to prove that one who created a suite of applications without which a business unit will stop functioning comes under National Interest?
Just a thought.
I think - the spirit of EB-1 (manager) has to do with having full managerial control over people (performance management, hiring/ firing/ compensation rather than just supervisory control) and/or a business portfolio (say - head of a business division)
but as someone pointed out - let lawyers figure out the best strategy for each case.......
more...
pictures Hayden Panettiere Goes Boyish
raysaikat
04-21 01:17 PM
... it is essential that one be in H1-B status.
This is patently wrong. There are many people who are on EAD at the time of I-485 adjudication.
The only legal requirement is that the person has a valid offer from the I-140 sponsoring company (or some other one, if AC21 is used) for a same or similar job (similar to what was mentioned in the LC). In practice, the petitioner should have the job at the time of adjudication.
This is patently wrong. There are many people who are on EAD at the time of I-485 adjudication.
The only legal requirement is that the person has a valid offer from the I-140 sponsoring company (or some other one, if AC21 is used) for a same or similar job (similar to what was mentioned in the LC). In practice, the petitioner should have the job at the time of adjudication.
dresses title: Hayden Panettiere
americandesi
06-06 07:08 PM
The contract that you signed is valid only if UBS and your vendor have a work order between them stating that you will be offering your services to UBS from such and such date. As you failed the background check, I assume that they never executed such a work order.
Your vendor is asking for trouble. They're supposed to pay you the prevailing wage from the day you started working with them until the termination of employment. Moreover termination of employment is applicable only if they notify USCIS to cancel your H1. In such a case they're supposed to provide a return flight ticket for you and your dependents.
Your employer obviously doesn't know the rules governing H1 and is trying to play scare tactics with you. All you need to do now is to find another employer and transfer your H1. Then file a complaint with DOL to recover the backwages for the period you were on bench.
Your vendor is asking for trouble. They're supposed to pay you the prevailing wage from the day you started working with them until the termination of employment. Moreover termination of employment is applicable only if they notify USCIS to cancel your H1. In such a case they're supposed to provide a return flight ticket for you and your dependents.
Your employer obviously doesn't know the rules governing H1 and is trying to play scare tactics with you. All you need to do now is to find another employer and transfer your H1. Then file a complaint with DOL to recover the backwages for the period you were on bench.
more...
makeup hayden panettiere hairstyles
485Mbe4001
07-25 12:11 PM
Nice...Calculations work if its a public company with a responsibility to make profits and please shareholders. We are talking about an entity we really know nothing about, all calculations go out of the window in this case
-- I filed my 485 in dec 2004 :p i have spent many hours dreaming up rational calculations, but i feel i would have been better off watching the traffic from my office window.:(
Here is the calculation I came up with USCIS processing of our I-485 applications.
USCIS should allocate 140,000 applications in a fiscal year. So, in a month they need to process, at least, 140,000/ 12 = 11,667 applications.
Assuming that they have, at least, 20 working days in a month, they need to process 11,667/ 20 = 584 applications.
So, now the question is, how many employees does USCIS have and are dedicated to the I-485 processing? We don’t know the exact number. Considering that USCIS is getting lot of revenue, they should have, at least, 50 employees doing this work.
So, 584/50 = 12(Approx) applications they need to process in a day, per person.
So, do you think it is viable? Of course, it is…
What they need to process the I-485 application? They are not doing any FBI names check, or background check (Assuming that everything is done by other organization). So, how long does it take to review the I-485 application? Well, when I filled the application, it took me about 1 hour. So, to review it, let’s us say, it takes about 1/2 the time fill the application; that’s about half an hour. Considering the calculation that we made, it takes an about 6 hours to process 12 candidates. With this assumption, they still have 2 hours left to do miscellaneous tasks. Now the question is what the heck they are doing all the time? Why did they process only 80,000 applications in about 8 months? Are they lazy? Don’t they have enough employees (This shouldn’t be; an average Indian consultant company will have at least 20 employees!!). This is really a mystery. Anyways, if the USCIS really and whole heartedly wants to process the applications, they can; but they really don’t care about immigrants or their plights. :rolleyes:
-- I filed my 485 in dec 2004 :p i have spent many hours dreaming up rational calculations, but i feel i would have been better off watching the traffic from my office window.:(
Here is the calculation I came up with USCIS processing of our I-485 applications.
USCIS should allocate 140,000 applications in a fiscal year. So, in a month they need to process, at least, 140,000/ 12 = 11,667 applications.
Assuming that they have, at least, 20 working days in a month, they need to process 11,667/ 20 = 584 applications.
So, now the question is, how many employees does USCIS have and are dedicated to the I-485 processing? We don’t know the exact number. Considering that USCIS is getting lot of revenue, they should have, at least, 50 employees doing this work.
So, 584/50 = 12(Approx) applications they need to process in a day, per person.
So, do you think it is viable? Of course, it is…
What they need to process the I-485 application? They are not doing any FBI names check, or background check (Assuming that everything is done by other organization). So, how long does it take to review the I-485 application? Well, when I filled the application, it took me about 1 hour. So, to review it, let’s us say, it takes about 1/2 the time fill the application; that’s about half an hour. Considering the calculation that we made, it takes an about 6 hours to process 12 candidates. With this assumption, they still have 2 hours left to do miscellaneous tasks. Now the question is what the heck they are doing all the time? Why did they process only 80,000 applications in about 8 months? Are they lazy? Don’t they have enough employees (This shouldn’t be; an average Indian consultant company will have at least 20 employees!!). This is really a mystery. Anyways, if the USCIS really and whole heartedly wants to process the applications, they can; but they really don’t care about immigrants or their plights. :rolleyes:
girlfriend HAYDEN PANETTIERE gt; PHOTO
pgc10
02-03 12:13 PM
This is a grey area, in my opinion, some lawyers say that you should file those documents for AC21 and some say don't (just wait for RFE, if any). But I have seen people getting success and failure with either method on several other boards. Maybe it depends on how similar your new job description is to the old one and the IO.
hairstyles hayden-panettiere.jpg
snathan
05-20 06:19 PM
Not favoring Wipro or quitting person here. General comment..
we need to be careful and review all aspect of issues with mgr and HR before leaving service companies. If we really want to come and work in US then come as independent companies on H1. People keep quite and say 'yes' for everything until H1 is filed in offshore and once a high paid offer comes then leaving and start saying 'sue' this company etc.
they pay fees for H1/air-fares/insurances for commitment for onsite work for some period. If person A goes out, they have to invest same amount of $ on new person B to get there and loosing credit at client also. Are these factors not overhead to these kind of companies?
Becoming so much emotional for money matters is quite common. Be practical and think wisely and negotiate peacefully with HR/MGR. Sending mails with lot of anger and threats to companies etc really don't much help in practical life and things go worse. this kind of stories is not first time and has been going for many years, think it from both sides.
Be practical, thinking peacefully. All the best.
They are not doing any charity for the employees...they want profit and cares only about their interest and so the employee. Whats wrong with that...
we need to be careful and review all aspect of issues with mgr and HR before leaving service companies. If we really want to come and work in US then come as independent companies on H1. People keep quite and say 'yes' for everything until H1 is filed in offshore and once a high paid offer comes then leaving and start saying 'sue' this company etc.
they pay fees for H1/air-fares/insurances for commitment for onsite work for some period. If person A goes out, they have to invest same amount of $ on new person B to get there and loosing credit at client also. Are these factors not overhead to these kind of companies?
Becoming so much emotional for money matters is quite common. Be practical and think wisely and negotiate peacefully with HR/MGR. Sending mails with lot of anger and threats to companies etc really don't much help in practical life and things go worse. this kind of stories is not first time and has been going for many years, think it from both sides.
Be practical, thinking peacefully. All the best.
They are not doing any charity for the employees...they want profit and cares only about their interest and so the employee. Whats wrong with that...
zCool
01-30 01:41 PM
Sent email to all the ones below..
Use following list!
editor@lenconnect.com,editor@alconareview.com,bbro wn@allegannews.com,smurch@thealpenanews.com,letter s@annarbornews.com,edit@upnorthpub.com ,news@arenacindependent.com,argus@chartermi.net,ss mith@battlecr.gannett.com,forum@bc-times.com,newspaper@baymills.org,kmartin@mn.homeco mm.net,bcrnews@bcrnews.net,gkowalski@hometownlife. com,exponews@frontiernet.net,mseward@cadillacnews. com,kkuban@hometownlife.com,marcia.steffens@leader pub.com,rich.adams@cheboygantribune.com,ksmith@oe. homecomm.net,kmartin@mn.homecomm.net,cgoodaker@cra in.com,avalanche@i2k.net,editor@thedailyreport.com ,editor@pressandguide.com ,letters@freepress.com,letters@metrotimes.com,lett ers@detnews.com,john.eby@leaderpub.com,sean@dundee .net,edit@upnorthpub.com,rrudden@dailypress.net,sj enkins@hometownlife.com,kmartin@mn.homecomm.net,le tters@flintjournal.com,news@ncats.net,
smason@hometownlife.com,editor@gaylordheraldtimes. com,editor@ejourney.com,lpainter@grandhaventribune .com,pulse@grpress.com,gleiva@gtherald.com,dclark@ staffordgroup.com,editor@ilecamera.com,jminnis@gro ssepointenews.com,james.pruitt@hillsdale.net,Jim.H ayden@hollandsentinel.com,frontdesk@countywidenews paper.com,bsargent@mininggazette.com,resorter@voya ger.net,kniebel@hearstnp.com,editor@iosconews.com, marian@ironcountyreporter.com,news@ironmountaindai lynews.com,globenews@chartermi.net,editor@citpat.c om,frontdesk@birchrivergroup.com,rpierce@kalamazoo gazette.com,ksmith@oe.homecomm.net,sentinel@up.net ,dmelot@lsj.com,editor@countypress.com,editor@leel anaunews.com,mstuart@ht.homecomm.net dvarga@hometownlife.com,sbegnoche@ludingtondailyne ws.com,vanhulle@macombdaily.com,editor@marcellusne ws.com,msysop@hdtinfo.com,newsroom@miningjournal.n et,
Chronicle4@aol.com,mdnletters@mdn.net,editor@milan news.com ,mtrecept@ht.comecomm.net,tom@monroenews.com,tcyou ng@nemichigan.com,scoon@michigannewspapers.com,mun isingnews@jamadots.com,gcarlson@muskegonchronicle. com,donna@voicenews.com,jan.griffey@leaderpub.com, daguilar@gannett.com,cstone@ht.homecomm.net,neil.m unro@oakpress.com,editor@oceanaheraldjournal.com,e ditor@ontonagonherald.com,editor1@oscodapress.com, ksmith@oe.homecomm.net,kwint@petoskeynews.com,bkad rich@hometownlife.com,tdwalker@gannett.com,Editor@ piadvance.com,dvarga@hometownlife.com,frontdesk@bi rchrivergroup.com,gwinkelman@hometownlife.com,news @romeoobserver.com,editor@dailytribune.com,kmartin @mn.homecomm.net,letters@thesaginawnews.com,editor @stignacenews.com,editor@salinereporter.com,publis her@allegannews.com,editor@sooeveningnews,sblack@h t.homecomm.net,
wpeal@hometownlife.com,editor@thenewsherald.com ,letters@heraldpalladium.com,newsroom@sturgisjourn al.com,editor@tecumsehherald.com,edit@upnorthpub.c om,letters@record-eagle.com,news@tctimes.com,sarmbruster@hometownlif e.com,editor@troy-somersetgazette.com,joe.warner@advisorsource.com,v ptimes@sbcglobal.net,news@thescngroup.com.,news@tr icityrecord.com,letterstotheeditor@advancenewspape rs.com,lruehlen@hometownlife.com,smason@hometownli fe.com,editor@whitelakebeacon.net,editor@ypsilanti courier.com
Use following list!
editor@lenconnect.com,editor@alconareview.com,bbro wn@allegannews.com,smurch@thealpenanews.com,letter s@annarbornews.com,edit@upnorthpub.com ,news@arenacindependent.com,argus@chartermi.net,ss mith@battlecr.gannett.com,forum@bc-times.com,newspaper@baymills.org,kmartin@mn.homeco mm.net,bcrnews@bcrnews.net,gkowalski@hometownlife. com,exponews@frontiernet.net,mseward@cadillacnews. com,kkuban@hometownlife.com,marcia.steffens@leader pub.com,rich.adams@cheboygantribune.com,ksmith@oe. homecomm.net,kmartin@mn.homecomm.net,cgoodaker@cra in.com,avalanche@i2k.net,editor@thedailyreport.com ,editor@pressandguide.com ,letters@freepress.com,letters@metrotimes.com,lett ers@detnews.com,john.eby@leaderpub.com,sean@dundee .net,edit@upnorthpub.com,rrudden@dailypress.net,sj enkins@hometownlife.com,kmartin@mn.homecomm.net,le tters@flintjournal.com,news@ncats.net,
smason@hometownlife.com,editor@gaylordheraldtimes. com,editor@ejourney.com,lpainter@grandhaventribune .com,pulse@grpress.com,gleiva@gtherald.com,dclark@ staffordgroup.com,editor@ilecamera.com,jminnis@gro ssepointenews.com,james.pruitt@hillsdale.net,Jim.H ayden@hollandsentinel.com,frontdesk@countywidenews paper.com,bsargent@mininggazette.com,resorter@voya ger.net,kniebel@hearstnp.com,editor@iosconews.com, marian@ironcountyreporter.com,news@ironmountaindai lynews.com,globenews@chartermi.net,editor@citpat.c om,frontdesk@birchrivergroup.com,rpierce@kalamazoo gazette.com,ksmith@oe.homecomm.net,sentinel@up.net ,dmelot@lsj.com,editor@countypress.com,editor@leel anaunews.com,mstuart@ht.homecomm.net dvarga@hometownlife.com,sbegnoche@ludingtondailyne ws.com,vanhulle@macombdaily.com,editor@marcellusne ws.com,msysop@hdtinfo.com,newsroom@miningjournal.n et,
Chronicle4@aol.com,mdnletters@mdn.net,editor@milan news.com ,mtrecept@ht.comecomm.net,tom@monroenews.com,tcyou ng@nemichigan.com,scoon@michigannewspapers.com,mun isingnews@jamadots.com,gcarlson@muskegonchronicle. com,donna@voicenews.com,jan.griffey@leaderpub.com, daguilar@gannett.com,cstone@ht.homecomm.net,neil.m unro@oakpress.com,editor@oceanaheraldjournal.com,e ditor@ontonagonherald.com,editor1@oscodapress.com, ksmith@oe.homecomm.net,kwint@petoskeynews.com,bkad rich@hometownlife.com,tdwalker@gannett.com,Editor@ piadvance.com,dvarga@hometownlife.com,frontdesk@bi rchrivergroup.com,gwinkelman@hometownlife.com,news @romeoobserver.com,editor@dailytribune.com,kmartin @mn.homecomm.net,letters@thesaginawnews.com,editor @stignacenews.com,editor@salinereporter.com,publis her@allegannews.com,editor@sooeveningnews,sblack@h t.homecomm.net,
wpeal@hometownlife.com,editor@thenewsherald.com ,letters@heraldpalladium.com,newsroom@sturgisjourn al.com,editor@tecumsehherald.com,edit@upnorthpub.c om,letters@record-eagle.com,news@tctimes.com,sarmbruster@hometownlif e.com,editor@troy-somersetgazette.com,joe.warner@advisorsource.com,v ptimes@sbcglobal.net,news@thescngroup.com.,news@tr icityrecord.com,letterstotheeditor@advancenewspape rs.com,lruehlen@hometownlife.com,smason@hometownli fe.com,editor@whitelakebeacon.net,editor@ypsilanti courier.com
voldemar
03-20 11:15 AM
Not sure how withdrawing an approved I140 is good for the employee??
The general feeling is that I140 withdrawal is not necessary for the employer (but H1b is). But employers used to do this for labor substitution - now there is no such incentive. But still some lawyers suggest employers to do this - in my old company which is a large well known software company (with 10k+ employees worldwide) the HR group follows immigration attorneys almost blindly. All immigration issues are handled by a big law firm - many of regular immigration matters are done by paralegals who does not know much (I am not exaggerating when I say I know more than them) - but our HR has a policy that they would follow what those attorney/paralegal is saying. It seems the law firm is suggesting them to withdraw all applications including approved i140 - obviously the law firm would charge them for this so that is their interest.
And law firm is right, they protect their clients. Search this forum for I-140 revocation by USCIS. I-140 was approved and then revoked by USCIS itself. In that case AC21 does not help, 485 will be denied.
The general feeling is that I140 withdrawal is not necessary for the employer (but H1b is). But employers used to do this for labor substitution - now there is no such incentive. But still some lawyers suggest employers to do this - in my old company which is a large well known software company (with 10k+ employees worldwide) the HR group follows immigration attorneys almost blindly. All immigration issues are handled by a big law firm - many of regular immigration matters are done by paralegals who does not know much (I am not exaggerating when I say I know more than them) - but our HR has a policy that they would follow what those attorney/paralegal is saying. It seems the law firm is suggesting them to withdraw all applications including approved i140 - obviously the law firm would charge them for this so that is their interest.
And law firm is right, they protect their clients. Search this forum for I-140 revocation by USCIS. I-140 was approved and then revoked by USCIS itself. In that case AC21 does not help, 485 will be denied.
No comments:
Post a Comment